On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > I experience a related issue. lseek(SEEK_HOLE) error checks are too > strict. Files are not added to archive if lseek(SEEK_HOLE) fails. > Ignoring lseek(SEEK_HOLE) at least in ENOTTY case would be preferable. Just noticed that lseek(1) doesn't document ENOTTY as a valid response code. Should it? TimReceived on Sun Mar 25 2012 - 21:32:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC