Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

From: Mark Linimon <linimon_at_lonesome.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:33 -0500
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any
> big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving
> to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?

 - ZFS eats bytes for breakfast.  It is completely inappropriate
   for anything with less than 4GB RAM.

 - ZFS performs poorly under disk-nearly-full conditions.

mcl
Received on Wed May 23 2012 - 20:05:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:27 UTC