On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer <brewer.doug_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line >> > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal >> > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free >> > on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M >> > ram.. just drop me a line.. >> >> Hi, >> >> Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the >> cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a >> cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential >> diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each >> little change that I do. > > Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well > on the train or at a cafe before being committed. I tend to have a _lot_ of FreeBSD devices on me. People who have seen me hack can attest to this. >> I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small >> handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just >> that - build breaks. They're easily fixed. > > I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam Leffler > was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an embedded device, right?), > he had never broke the build. He's better than I? :) adrianReceived on Sat Nov 10 2012 - 15:03:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC