Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800
On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer <brewer.doug_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line
>> > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal
>> > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free
>> > on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M
>> > ram..  just drop me a line..
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the
>> cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a
>> cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential
>> diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each
>> little change that I do.
>
> Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well
> on the train or at a cafe before being committed.

I tend to have a _lot_ of FreeBSD devices on me. People who have seen
me hack can attest to this.

>> I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small
>> handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just
>> that - build breaks. They're easily fixed.
>
> I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam Leffler
> was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an embedded device, right?),
> he had never broke the build.

He's better than I? :)


adrian
Received on Sat Nov 10 2012 - 15:03:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC