[OT] Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800
Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer <brewer.doug_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns <break19_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me
> >> > a line outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's
> >> > just a personal box.. on a residential internet service, I have
> >> > an amd64 box with 600G free on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a
> >> > smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M ram..  just drop me a
> >> > line..
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the
> >> cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or
> >> at a cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out
> >> potential diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk
> >> space for each little change that I do.
> >
> > Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well
> > on the train or at a cafe before being committed.
> 
> I tend to have a _lot_ of FreeBSD devices on me. People who have seen
> me hack can attest to this.
> 
> >> I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a
> >> small handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks
> >> are just that - build breaks. They're easily fixed.
> >
> > I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam
> > Leffler was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an
> > embedded device, right?), he had never broke the build.
> 
> He's better than I? :)
> 

funny...
there is no angry letters about 100500 letters from tb
after switch to clang... 
but when Adrian break build [again] we have it...

Adrian, thanks for your work. No need to be offended by trolls

> 
> adrian



-- 
wbr, tiger