On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer_at_omnilan.de> wrote: > schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime): >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer >> <h.schmalzbauer_at_omnilan.de> wrote: >>> ... >> After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch >> that at least compiles there: >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch > > Thanks a lot! In the meantime I made the original patch compiling. I > simply looked at the changes which were made around july in the fuse > project to follow changes in head (checkpath(), vrecycle() and > vtruncbuf()) and "reverted" them. > Since I have no idea about the code I modified, I'm happy that you did a > more qualified patch set :-) > >> Of course, I didn't have a chance to test it because I'm also out for >> vacation right now but please do and report. > > Happy holiday!!! If you're by chance arround the Oktoberfest, drop me a > note, I'll pay you a Maß (or any other drink if you don't like > „Wiesnbier“) :-) I really hoped to make this year, but no luck :/ >>> ... >>> Some questions: Is this planned to be mfc'd and if so, how can one know? >> In which sense "how can one know?". We usually specify MFC timeouts in >> the commit message (not sure if this answers your concerns). > > Yep, that's what I wanted to know. So if there's no MFC timeout in the > log, it's not intended to be MFCd ever I guess. > > Thanks a lot! > World/Kernel compiled fine in the meantime, I'll do some sshfs tests. Did you do any test in the end? Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Mon Oct 08 2012 - 12:57:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC