On 09/11/12 09:56, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-09-11 16:27, Tijl Coosemans wrote:> On 11-09-2012 16:10, > Dimitry Andric wrote: > ... >>> Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of >>> clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a >>> high priority item for upstream. >>> >>> This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will >>> care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about >>> licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using >>> gcc for the time being. >> >> Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions? > > It seems to, at least in specific cases; Steve posted about this in an > earlier thread on -current: > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120905221310.GA97847 > _______________________________________________ If true, this is a serious problem, especially for those of us who use FreeBSD in a scientific computing environment. -NathanReceived on Wed Sep 12 2012 - 20:42:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC