On 2012-09-11 16:27, Tijl Coosemans wrote:> On 11-09-2012 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >> Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of >> clang's (really llvm's) weaker points. It is currently not really a >> high priority item for upstream. >> >> This is obviously something that a certain part of our userbase will >> care a lot about, while most of the time they won't care so much about >> licensing or politics. So those people are probably better off using >> gcc for the time being. > > Does it affect the accuracy of libm functions? It seems to, at least in specific cases; Steve posted about this in an earlier thread on -current: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120905221310.GA97847Received on Tue Sep 11 2012 - 12:56:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC