> snip >> >> Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD >> Packet Firewall that survives upgrades. Perhaps I should just take all of >> the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2. >> >> >> Darrel >> >> > > On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall > > OpenBSD 4.5 version of PF firewall which is included with the base FreeBSD > 8.x and 9.x releases is no longer supported by OpenBSD and very back level. > > The most current version of OpenBSD is 5.1. PF version 5.0 changed the syntax > of the NAT statement making PF no longer backwards compatible which breaks > some Freebsd standard, so updated versions of OpenBSD PF will no longer be > mass ported to FreeBSD. Any bug fix code to OpenBSD PF will have to be > incorporated by hand into FreeBSD's version of PF from this point on. > > The following will shine some more light on the subject. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167057 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-September/006740.html > > Second reply. I intended to change the subject line to solved. Just for informational purposes, you might not want to do any firewall comparison on the OpenBSD misc list. A Packet Firewall developer responded to me personally, writing that the signal-to-noise ratio was too high and to refrain from posting to the list. So much for solving problems and sharing ideas. DarrelReceived on Sat Sep 22 2012 - 19:39:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC