On 2013/04/14, at 12:11, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas_at_bris.ac.uk> wrote: > A migration *guide*, yes. Tools to convert one syntax to another: no. > > ok, so what is the brief migraiton advice? It's still being written. > The Handbook mentions PF and IPFW. > I gather from your mails that PF is the recommended choice. > Is that so? Yes, because of how much easier it is to convert from ipf to pf version ipf to ipfw. > If I choose PF, can I just follow the > Handbook PF section, and once it's working, > remove all IPF related kernel options and config > files? Yes, that will be the plan. Regards, -- Rui PauloReceived on Sun Apr 14 2013 - 18:33:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC