Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

From: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:36:43 +0300
Yes

On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote:


On head?



Adrian




Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T

--------------------
Artyom MirgorodskiyOn Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM,  <artyom.mirgorodsky_at_gmail.com> wrote: 



I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision.

On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas?
> 
> Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS wrote 
> into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies about 
> which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful message
> shows the same interrupts used in both cases:
> 
> > HEAD:
> > 
> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18
> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10
> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60
> > 
> > versus
> > 
> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18
> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci10
> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60
> 
> 
-- 
Artyom Mirgorodskiy


-- 
Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Received on Thu Apr 18 2013 - 15:37:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC