Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.

Hm, so -HEAD everything else except the wifi code?

That's really odd. I updated to -HEAD this morning just to test the
AR9287 for you and it was peachy!


Adrian

On 18 April 2013 10:36, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
<artyom.mirgorodsky_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes
>
>
>
> On Thursday 18 April 2013 10:30:33 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> On head?
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T
>
> ________________________________
>
> Artyom MirgorodskiyOn Apr 18, 2013 10:06 AM, <artyom.mirgorodsky_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I tried to check out revision 245031 (only sys/dev/ath) and got a working
> WiFi. I'll try to find a broken revision.
>
>
>
> On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:37:17 John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, April 18, 2013 11:22:38 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> > Ok, the relevant / interesting bit:s. John, any ideas?
>
>>
>
>> Only that this means absolutely nothing? These are the values the BIOS
>> wrote
>
>> into the registers which we use as hints about whether or not ACPI lies
>> about
>
>> which interrupts are used when APIC is disabled. The actually useful
>> message
>
>> shows the same interrupts used in both cases:
>
>>
>
>> > HEAD:
>
>> >
>
>> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18
>
>> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on
>> > pci10
>
>> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60
>
>> >
>
>> > versus
>
>> >
>
>> > pcib2: slot 0 INTA hardwired to IRQ 18
>
>> > ath0: <Atheros 9287> mem 0xe0500000-0xe050ffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on
>> > pci10
>
>> > ioapic0: routing intpin 18 (PCI IRQ 18) to lapic 0 vector 60
>
>>
>
>>
>
> --
>
> Artyom Mirgorodskiy
>
>
> --
>
> Artyom Mirgorodskiy