Thanks, Bapt, for answering. Am 07.08.2013 19:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c), >> I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes. >> >> Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar >> messages about an ld problem (invalid DSO for symbol 'xxx' definition), >> followed by the lib, which symbols are not found. >> >> With a recent 10.0-CURRENT (at least r253839) you can try this for >> example with the following two ports: >> > normally I had tracked down all those ports, except if you are building them > with nom default options, #cd /usr/ports/www/evolution-webcal #make config ===> No options to configure #cd /usr/ports/editors/nano #make config ===> No options to configure > What that means is basically the said ports are missing some -lbla in ldflags, > > The missing ones are those listed in the line following the DSO bla > in nano for example the first failure means -liconv is missing. Yupp, thanks, the following two patches seem to work: --- Makefile.orig 2013-07-17 16:59:50.000000000 +0200 +++ Makefile 2013-08-07 20:42:11.000000000 +0200 _at__at_ -15,11 +15,13 _at__at_ CONFLICTS= nano-devel-2* +LIB_DEPENDS= tinfow:${PORTSDIR}/devel/ncurses + GNU_CONFIGURE= yes CONFIGURE_ARGS= --docdir=${DOCSDIR} CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include -LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib +LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ltinfow .include <bsd.port.options.mk> --- Makefile.orig 2013-06-20 17:40:13.000000000 +0200 +++ Makefile 2013-08-07 20:47:21.000000000 +0200 _at__at_ -23,7 +23,7 _at__at_ USE_GNOME= gnomeprefix gnomehack intlhack evolutiondataserver libgnomeui GNU_CONFIGURE= yes CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include -LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib +LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lgthread-2.0 GCONF_SCHEMAS= evolution-webcal.schemas > > I afk until 24th so I can't commit any fix to the said ports. > There were properly building in my exp-run for the said change, meaning either > you build with non default options im that case the port requires a fix or > perhaps your ports tree is not uptodate, in particular lots of those failures > are fixed by the recent glib update. Hmm. As far as I can say my ports tree is uptodate and I did the complete glib update (/usr/ports/UPDATING entry 20130731). So I have no clue, why editors/nano does complain about devel/ncurses. In particular I am wondering about the misbehaviour of my port math/saga. As I wrote before, the autotools process does not find libopencv.so, only and only if HEAD is using /usr/bin/ld r253839. Probably there is a hidden problem, not seen before without the ld patch? Any hint would be very appreciated. Many thanks for your fast help and greetings from Göttingen in Germany, Rainer > > regards, > Bapt >Received on Wed Aug 07 2013 - 17:01:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC