Re: Port problems after r253839 on HEAD

Am 07.08.2013 21:01 (UTC+1) schrieb Rainer Hurling:
> Thanks, Bapt, for answering.
> 
> Am 07.08.2013 19:43, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>> After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c),
>>> I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes.
>>>
>>> Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar
>>> messages about an ld problem (invalid DSO for symbol 'xxx' definition),
>>> followed by the lib, which symbols are not found.
>>>
>>> With a recent 10.0-CURRENT (at least r253839) you can try this for
>>> example with the following two ports:
>>>
>> normally I had tracked down all those ports, except if you are building them
>> with nom default options,
> 
> #cd /usr/ports/www/evolution-webcal
> #make config
> ===> No options to configure
> 
> #cd /usr/ports/editors/nano
> #make config
> ===> No options to configure
> 
>> What that means is basically the said ports are missing some -lbla in ldflags,
>>
>> The missing ones are those listed in the line following the DSO bla
>> in nano for example the first failure means -liconv is missing.
> 
> Yupp, thanks, the following two patches seem to work:
> 
> --- Makefile.orig	2013-07-17 16:59:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ Makefile	2013-08-07 20:42:11.000000000 +0200
> _at__at_ -15,11 +15,13 _at__at_
> 
>  CONFLICTS=	nano-devel-2*
> 
> +LIB_DEPENDS=	tinfow:${PORTSDIR}/devel/ncurses
> +
>  GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
> 
>  CONFIGURE_ARGS=	--docdir=${DOCSDIR}
>  CPPFLAGS+=	-I${LOCALBASE}/include
> -LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
> +LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ltinfow
> 
>  .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
> 
> 
> 
> --- Makefile.orig	2013-06-20 17:40:13.000000000 +0200
> +++ Makefile	2013-08-07 20:47:21.000000000 +0200
> _at__at_ -23,7 +23,7 _at__at_
>  USE_GNOME=	gnomeprefix gnomehack intlhack evolutiondataserver libgnomeui
>  GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
>  CPPFLAGS+=	-I${LOCALBASE}/include
> -LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
> +LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lgthread-2.0
> 
>  GCONF_SCHEMAS=	evolution-webcal.schemas
> 
> 
>>
>> I afk until 24th so I can't commit any fix to the said ports.
> 
> 
>> There were properly building in my exp-run for the said change, meaning either
>> you build with non default options im that case the port requires a fix or
>> perhaps your ports tree is not uptodate, in particular lots of those failures
>> are fixed by the recent glib update.
> 
> Hmm. As far as I can say my ports tree is uptodate and I did the
> complete glib update (/usr/ports/UPDATING entry 20130731). So I have no
> clue, why editors/nano does complain about devel/ncurses.
> 
> In particular I am wondering about the misbehaviour of my port
> math/saga. As I wrote before, the autotools process does not find
> libopencv.so, only and only if HEAD is using /usr/bin/ld r253839.
> Probably there is a hidden problem, not seen before without the ld
> patch? Any hint would be very appreciated.

Ok, after getting your hint about missing LDFLAGS I narrowed it down for
SAGA GIS 2.1.0. As complained in the config.log, conftest for autotools
is also missing one library. The following in math/saga should do the
trick (I will open a PR for it):

--- Makefile.orig	2013-07-31 18:09:58.000000000 +0200
+++ Makefile	2013-08-08 11:11:15.000000000 +0200
_at__at_ -47,7 +47,7 _at__at_

 .include <bsd.port.options.mk>

-LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib
+LDFLAGS+=	-L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lopencv_core
 CONFIGURE_ARGS+=	CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"

 .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MPYTHON}


So no problems left for me with new /usr/bin/ld :)
Thanks again for any help.

Greetings,
Rainer

> 
> Many thanks for your fast help and greetings from Göttingen in Germany,
> Rainer
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
>>