... bug peter. And alfred. Alfred broke this stuff. :) -adrian On 12 August 2013 21:33, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 21:36 -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno_at_yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt >> > >> > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the >> > system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot. >> > >> > I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system to boot, >> > but I don't think I did it right? >> > >> >> That shouldn't happen. Maybe you've run out of kmem? It's limited to only >> like 400MB on i386. Or maybe you've blown out a data structure with all >> of those CPUs. >> >> Scott >> >> > > Since we can still do this on stable/7 (gross), I kind of think this is > a low priority regression. Not even sure where to look, nor do I really > want to. :-) > > If someone has a clueby4 to thwack me around with, I'd appreciate it. > > Sean > > p.s. We won't be caring about this for much longer I fear over at > $DAYJOB, so if someone wants to address this I can test it for a few > more months. After that, we won't care about it too much.Received on Tue Aug 13 2013 - 03:25:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC