On 8/21/2013 2:49 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi, > > While packaging my just-rebuilt ports today, I noticed a strange message > occurring during the package creation stage: > > $ sudo make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg repackage > ===> Building package for pkg-1.1.4_1 > Creating package for pkg-1.1.4_1 > Service unavailable$ > > In fact, *every* make package/repackage produces the "Service > unavailable" message. The message is actually produced by the pkg(8) > command, which is run as follows: > > /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static create -o /usr/ports/packages pkg-1.1.4_1 > > Now comes the interesting part: if you use /usr/local/sbin/pkg instead, > the "Service unavailable" message does *not* appear. > > It turns out this is because pkg(8) uses libarchive, which is now > compiled with iconv support from base by default. But the iconv in base > does *not* work properly in statically linked executables. For example, > take this small program: ... > Of course, there may be other consumers of libc's iconv that might want > to link statically, so it should really be fixed there instead. For > example, by not doing the dlopen, and failing gracefully. Or maybe by > actually linking in (a subset of) the /usr/lib/i18n libraries. > > -Dimitry > I agree this is an iconv issue and that should be fixed instead of bandaging consumers as they are found. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC