Hi, While packaging my just-rebuilt ports today, I noticed a strange message occurring during the package creation stage: $ sudo make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg repackage ===> Building package for pkg-1.1.4_1 Creating package for pkg-1.1.4_1 Service unavailable$ In fact, *every* make package/repackage produces the "Service unavailable" message. The message is actually produced by the pkg(8) command, which is run as follows: /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static create -o /usr/ports/packages pkg-1.1.4_1 Now comes the interesting part: if you use /usr/local/sbin/pkg instead, the "Service unavailable" message does *not* appear. It turns out this is because pkg(8) uses libarchive, which is now compiled with iconv support from base by default. But the iconv in base does *not* work properly in statically linked executables. For example, take this small program: #include <err.h> #include <iconv.h> int main(void) { iconv_t ic = iconv_open("UTF-8", "ISO-8859-1"); if (ic == (iconv_t)-1) err(1, "iconv_open failed"); iconv_close(ic); return 0; } If you compile and link this statically, it will produce: $ cc -static iconv-test.c -o iconv-test-static $ ./iconv-test-static iconv-test-static: iconv_open failed: Invalid argument Service unavailable$ The reason for the message is that libc's iconv tries to dlopen(3) a dynamic library in /usr/lib/i18n, which does not work in static executables. As a quick fix for pkg(8), we could build the static version of libarchive without -DHAVE_ICONV and friends. This also helps other consumers of libarchive that link statically. Of course, there may be other consumers of libc's iconv that might want to link statically, so it should really be fixed there instead. For example, by not doing the dlopen, and failing gracefully. Or maybe by actually linking in (a subset of) the /usr/lib/i18n libraries. -DimitryReceived on Wed Aug 21 2013 - 17:49:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC