On 8/24/13 3:41 PM, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:35:12AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 8/24/13 3:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>>>> In message <52174D51.2050601_at_digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes: >>>>> >>>>>>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; >>>>>>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; >>>>>> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with >>>>>> gcc in ports, that is. >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>> well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running >>>> kernel on my VPS (xen) >>>> I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I >>>> had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel. >>>> >>>> >>> Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've >>> seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. >> I don't know.. whatever RootBSD run, but the fact that I needed gcc >> for anything suggests that we should keep it around for a while. > Why do you need to use gcc for everything? What happens if you use clang? > Be specific, without details this is just FUD. > > Roman > I couldn't even get it to compile a few weeks ago. i386 xen kernel.. gcc breezed straight through (though getting it to boot was another story)Received on Sat Aug 24 2013 - 12:44:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC