On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Claude Buisson wrote: > Perhaps you could have a look at the fact that lang/gcc is at 4.6.3, > and lang/gcc46 is no more a snapshot but a true release 4.6.4. I am aware of that. Owed to a strongly voiced desire by users, I am triggering a rebuild of lang/gcc as rarely as possible. So, instead of going from 4.6.4 and soon 4.7.x, I submitted an update to 4.7.3 to portmgr for an -exp run last weekend. > IMHO, lang/gcc must be discontinued, or updated to 4.6.4 and > lang/gcc46 discontinued ? Neither. :-) Of all lang/gcc* ports, lang/gcc is the one to use (and hence keep). And lang/gcc46, lang/gcc47,... will remain in place for a while for use by those interested in an older version (or broken ports requiring one) or those interested in tracker newer versions. GeraldReceived on Tue Aug 27 2013 - 18:42:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC