Re: Committing PEFS to CURRENT

From: Alexandre Biancalana <biancalana_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:20:55 -0200
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg_at_funkthat.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over?
>  What
> > > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we
> have
> > > > to live w/ the code?
> > >
> > > I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon..
> > >
> >
> > on a side note, i applied the patch to stable/9 out of curiosity and the
> > kernel failed to build the module
> > however i could install fine from ports.
>
> Correct, there is no support for old kernels in the patch.
> Port will be maintained and will provide support for older versions in
> case PEFS finds its way to 10.0.



Hi,

 Are there any news about PEFS commit ?

Regards,
Received on Fri Dec 27 2013 - 18:20:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC