Alexandre Biancalana wrote this message on Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 17:20 -0200: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou_at_gmail.com>wrote: > > > On (07/10/2013 21:59), Outback Dingo wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou_at_gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg_at_funkthat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > But will the work get done to clean it up after the freeze is over? > > What > > > > > happens if it doesn't, will it get removed before 10.1 or will we > > have > > > > > to live w/ the code? > > > > > > > > I still hope not to get hit by bus any time soon.. > > > > > > > > > > on a side note, i applied the patch to stable/9 out of curiosity and the > > > kernel failed to build the module > > > however i could install fine from ports. > > > > Correct, there is no support for old kernels in the patch. > > Port will be maintained and will provide support for older versions in > > case PEFS finds its way to 10.0. > > Are there any news about PEFS commit ? It's definately not going into 10.0, but it could make it in a future release, but... I haven't heard back about plans for moving forward on the project. I'm definately interested in getting this in the tree, but have other work that is higher priority right now. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."Received on Fri Dec 27 2013 - 18:51:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC