Hi Jim, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Harris <jim.harris_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Neel Natu <neelnatu_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The following patch teaches pciconf(8) to display the table and pba >> offsets when it displays the MSI-X capability. >> >> The new output format will look like: >> >> cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages in map 0x1c[0x0][0x2000] enabled >> OR >> cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages in maps 0x10[0x0] and >> 0x14[0x1000] enabled >> >> Any objections to committing the patch? > > > Functionally I think this is a good addition. More information from pciconf > the better. > > Other comments below. > >> >> best >> Neel >> >> Index: usr.sbin/pciconf/cap.c >> =================================================================== >> --- cap.c (revision 246087) >> +++ cap.c (working copy) >> _at__at_ -449,22 +449,30 _at__at_ >> static void >> cap_msix(int fd, struct pci_conf *p, uint8_t ptr) >> { >> - uint32_t val; >> + uint32_t val, table_offset, pba_offset; > > > Variables should be in alphabetical order. > Ok. >> >> uint16_t ctrl; >> int msgnum, table_bar, pba_bar; >> >> ctrl = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_CTRL, 2); >> msgnum = (ctrl & PCIM_MSIXCTRL_TABLE_SIZE) + 1; >> + > > > Newline added intentionally? > Yes. >> >> val = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_TABLE, 4); >> table_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); >> + table_offset = val & ~PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK; >> + >> val = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_PBA, 4); >> - pba_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); >> + pba_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); > > > Looks like these two lines only have whitespace difference. > Yes, there was trailing whitespace there previously. >> >> + pba_offset = val & ~PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK; >> + >> printf("MSI-X supports %d message%s ", msgnum, >> (msgnum == 1) ? "" : "s"); >> - if (table_bar == pba_bar) >> - printf("in map 0x%x", table_bar); >> - else >> - printf("in maps 0x%x and 0x%x", table_bar, pba_bar); >> + if (table_bar == pba_bar) { >> + printf("in map 0x%x[0x%x][0x%x]", >> + table_bar, table_offset, pba_offset); >> + } else { >> + printf("in maps 0x%x[0x%x] and 0x%x[0x%x]", >> + table_bar, table_offset, pba_bar, pba_offset); >> + } > > > Seems like at least for the case where the table and pba are behind > different BARs, this will exceed 80 characters. So maybe the maps always go > on a new line? Similar to what's done at the end of cap_express for > printing the link speed. > Ok, the new format will look like: cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled Table in map 0x1c[0x0], PBA in map 0x1c[0x2000] Updated patch at the end of the email. best Neel >> >> if (ctrl & PCIM_MSIXCTRL_MSIX_ENABLE) >> printf(" enabled"); >> } Index: usr.sbin/pciconf/cap.c =================================================================== --- usr.sbin/pciconf/cap.c (revision 246087) +++ usr.sbin/pciconf/cap.c (working copy) _at__at_ -449,24 +449,28 _at__at_ static void cap_msix(int fd, struct pci_conf *p, uint8_t ptr) { - uint32_t val; + uint32_t pba_offset, table_offset, val; + int msgnum, pba_bar, table_bar; uint16_t ctrl; - int msgnum, table_bar, pba_bar; ctrl = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_CTRL, 2); msgnum = (ctrl & PCIM_MSIXCTRL_TABLE_SIZE) + 1; + val = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_TABLE, 4); table_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); + table_offset = val & ~PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK; + val = read_config(fd, &p->pc_sel, ptr + PCIR_MSIX_PBA, 4); - pba_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); - printf("MSI-X supports %d message%s ", msgnum, - (msgnum == 1) ? "" : "s"); - if (table_bar == pba_bar) - printf("in map 0x%x", table_bar); - else - printf("in maps 0x%x and 0x%x", table_bar, pba_bar); - if (ctrl & PCIM_MSIXCTRL_MSIX_ENABLE) - printf(" enabled"); + pba_bar = PCIR_BAR(val & PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK); + pba_offset = val & ~PCIM_MSIX_BIR_MASK; + + printf("MSI-X supports %d message%s%s\n", msgnum, + (msgnum == 1) ? "" : "s", + (ctrl & PCIM_MSIXCTRL_MSIX_ENABLE) ? ", enabled" : ""); + + printf(" "); + printf("Table in map 0x%x[0x%x], PBA in map 0x%x[0x%x]", + table_bar, table_offset, pba_bar, pba_offset); } static voidReceived on Thu Jan 31 2013 - 23:37:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:34 UTC