Re: panic: LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags

From: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:08:59 +0300
On 7 February 2013 19:42, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> on 07/02/2013 17:36 Sergey Kandaurov said the following:
>> I tested the patch without the (*vpp != dvp) change.
>> It works well.
>>
>> It's something unrelated but when doing ls -l
>> on server (patched) and client (unpatched) sides,
>> I found some inconsistency in returned stats.
>> Or more precisely:
>>
>> NFS server
>> # stat -s /pool1/user1000/.zfs/shares/..
>> st_dev=2050684725 st_ino=1 st_mode=040555 st_nlink=4 st_uid=0 st_gid=0
>> st_rdev=0 st_size=4 st_atime=1360251211 st_mtime=1359551493
>> st_ctime=1359551493 st_birthtime=1359551493 st_blksize=4096
>> st_blocks=0 st_flags=0
>>
>> NFS client
>> # stat -s /home/user1000/.zfs/shares/..
>> st_dev=2050684725 st_ino=7 st_mode=040555 st_nlink=2 st_uid=0 st_gid=0
>> st_rdev=1377468712 st_size=2 st_atime=1360251104 st_mtime=1359551493
>> st_ctime=1359551493 st_birthtime=-1 st_blksize=4096 st_blocks=3
>> st_flags=0
>
> Hmm, this looks more consistent with the earlier patch.
> Are you sure that you really tested the new kernel (on the server)?

Sorry, I indeed booted a wrong kernel.
Now tested the really new kernel :) And it works as well.
stat -s looks consistent, thanks.

# stat -s /home/user1000/.zfs/shares/..
st_dev=2050684725 st_ino=1 st_mode=040555 st_nlink=4 st_uid=0 st_gid=0
st_rdev=0 st_size=4 st_atime=1360252962 st_mtime=1359551493
st_ctime=1359551493 st_birthtime=-1 st_blksize=4096 st_blocks=0
st_flags=0

-- 
wbr,
pluknet
Received on Thu Feb 07 2013 - 15:09:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:34 UTC