Re: BSD sleep

From: Jason Birch <jbirch_at_jbirch.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:58:16 +1000
> Seriously, that explanation about different hours is not enough to prevent
> at least useful option.
> like
> sleep -f 1h
> (-f means force convert, without it you can see good explanation why sleep
> for 1 hour will be not sleep for 1 hour, and etc, and not get sleep at
> all.).
>

Do one thing, and do it well. What you have proposed involves:
 * an additional force flag
 * interpolation of what follows the force flag (does m mean minutes, or
months?)
 * expectations around time, time zones, and what an hours is.

That fails the litmus test on complexity for me personally - it seems like
a lot of complexity for not much gain.



> P.S. There is already non-portable feature in sleep - non-integer, and I'm
> sure that no one thought about some financists from various countries, who
> used to specify long numbers with separator, e.g. 3.600, and this means for
> them one hour and not 3 point 6 seconds.
>

This isn't a good reason for adding another non-portable feature.
Received on Wed May 29 2013 - 09:58:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:38 UTC