Re: CLang version was 3.3 and 3.4 in ports ...

From: Joe Nosay <superbisquit_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:52:56 -0500
Yes and thanks.


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Brooks Davis <brooks_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:57:07PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> > Since /usr/ports/UPDATING refers to 3.4, will that be added to the
> /usr/$BASE ?
> > Also, is it svn ot other to checkout the developmental version of
> > clang et al && what version are those? I'll probably get most of my
> > answers researching after I send this mail.
> > Apologies for any static.
>
> Are you referring to the 20131008 entry?  I'm pretty sure it is a typo
> that it mentions "clang > 3.3".  The code looks for a clang version of
> at least 3.3.
>
> We do plan to update clang to 3.4 once it's out since that will vastly
> improve lldb support among other things.  10.0 will certainly ship with
> 3.3.
>
> -- Brooks
>
Received on Mon Nov 04 2013 - 01:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC