Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

From: Allan Jude <freebsd_at_allanjude.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:04:37 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 2013-10-31 16:47, Eric Camachat wrote:
> It doesn't work with our (microsoft) proxy server, see below.
>
> root_at_basay:/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos # pkg update -f
> Updating repository catalogue
> pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/digests.txz: Service
> Unavailable
> pkg: No digest falling back on legacy catalog format
> pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/freebsd:10:x86:64/latest/repo.txz: Service
> Unavailable
> root_at_basay:/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos #
>
> Eric
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery_at_freebsd.org>
wrote:
>
>> We are pleased to announce that official binary packages are now
>> available for pkg, the next generation package management tool for
FreeBSD.
>>
>> Pkg allows you to either use ports with portmaster/portupgrade or to
>> have binary remote packages without ports.
>>
>> We have binary packages available for i386 and amd64 on
>> 8.3,8.4,9.1,9.2,10.0 and 11 (head).
>>
>> Pkg will be the default starting in FreeBSD 10.
>>
>> The pkg_install suite of tools pkg_create(1), pkg_add(1), and
>> pkg_info(1) (which ports also use), are deprecated and will be
>> discontinued in roughly 6 months. A communication regarding the
>> deprecation of the pkg_install suite of tools will be sent separately in
>> the future.
>>
>> If you are currently not using pkg and wish to, run the following as
>> root. Be sure not to add WITH_PKGNG=yes to your make.conf until after
>> pkg is installed.
>>
>>   # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg && make install clean
>>   # echo WITH_PKGNG=yes >> /etc/make.conf
>>   # pkg2ng
>>
>> You can now either continue to use ports with portmaster/portupgrade, as
>> before or switch to using binary packages only.
>>
>>
>> To use binary packages:
>>
>> 1. Ensure your pkg(8) is up-to-date. 'pkg -v' should say at least
>>    1.1.4_8. If it does not, first upgrade from ports.
>> 2. Remove any repository-specific configuration from
>>    /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf, such as PACKAGESITE, MIRROR_TYPE, PUBKEY.
>>    If this leaves your pkg.conf empty, just remove it.
>> 3. mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos
>> 4. Create the file /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf with:
>> FreeBSD: {
>>   url: "http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest",
>>   mirror_type: "srv",
>>   enabled: "yes"
>> }
>>
>> * Note that pkg.FreeBSD.org does not have a browsable web page on it and
>> does not have a DNS A record. This is intended as it is an SRV host.
>> pkg(8) knows how to properly use it. You can use 'pkg search' to browse
>> the available packages in the repository.
>>
>> Mirrors you may use instead of the global pkg.FreeBSD.org:
>>
>>     pkg.eu.FreeBSD.org
>>     pkg.us-east.FreeBSD.org
>>     pkg.us-west.FreeBSD.org
>>
>> Your system is now ready to use packages!
>>
>> Refer to the handbook section on pkgng for usage at
>>
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pkgng-intro.html
>> .
>> Also see 'man pkg' for examples or 'pkg help'.
>>
>>
>> Packages are built weekly from a snapshot of the Ports Collection every
>> Wednesday morning 01:00 UTC. They typically will be available in the
>> repository after a few days.
>>
>> Pkg 1.2 will be released in the coming month which will bring many
>> improvements including officially signed packages. FreeBSD 10's pkg
>> bootstrap now also supports signed pkg(8) installation.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bryan Drewery
>> on behalf of portmgr_at_
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
I am guessing the proxy passes the full HTTP request, without doing the
SRV lookup, and then can't find the A record.

I wonder if the http+pkg:// protocol can solve this, likely will require
a patch to fetch to implement the logic to do the dns lookup and make
the proxies request for the real hostname

- -- 
Allan Jude
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
 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=cv2E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thu Oct 31 2013 - 20:04:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:43 UTC