Re: clang+libc++ using missing powl

From: Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:48:57 -0700
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:02:18PM -0400, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Steve Kargl <
> sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > PS: I have working erfl and erfcl for ld80 archs.  I'm still
> > testing and refining the code.  It turns out that computing
> > the needed rational approximation is fairly difficult (at least
> > for me).
> >
> Not only for you , because function values are not very "smooth" , and
> representation by an approximation is very difficult . During many weeks ,
> I am trying to obtain good approximations to cumulative normal distribution
> and its inverse , without very much success .
> 
> Approximation to
> inverse cumulative normal distribution is much more difficult than
> cumulative normal distribution .
> 
> I am using Fortran double precision . I think , it is necessary to use an
> arbitrary precision package for optimization , but I do not have any one .
> 

If you are using gfortran version 4.7 or newer on FreeBSD, you 
should be able to use a quad precision type.  In addition, if
you are using lang/gcc46 or newer on your FreeBSD system, then
you have an arbitrary precision library installed (see math/mpfr). 

-- 
Steve
Received on Fri Sep 06 2013 - 17:48:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC