On 24/02/2014 15:40, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <530B666A.1000800_at_rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes: > >>> Please check how NTP is authenticated before giving bad advice, >>> it's all in the RFC. >>> >> v3 or v4? It is an optional part of the spec in both cases and again >> isn't required for 99% of people using ntpd as a client, which was the >> entire point of this exercise in the first place. > > Authentication of NTP is rapidly gaining focus these days, for obvious > reasons, so I think adopting software now which don't support it would > be needlessly shortsighted. > > 3 years ago I would have agree with you, but not now. > Fair enough, that isn't the real problem we are facing but rather than derail this thread even further I think it would be best to discuss that another day :)Received on Mon Feb 24 2014 - 15:09:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC