On 29.01.2014 16:42, David Chisnall wrote: > On 29 Jan 2014, at 15:37, Michael Schmiedgen <schmiedgen_at_gmx.net> wrote: >> On 29.01.2014 16:16, David Chisnall wrote: >>> On 29 Jan 2014, at 15:08, Michael Schmiedgen <schmiedgen_at_gmx.net> wrote: >> >> I thought OpenMP will be an integral part of LLVM/clang in near future, >> at least the front-end part? It seems there are plans to even integrate >> the runtime in the llvm project source tree: >> >> http://openmp.llvm.org/ >> >> Ok, so llvm/clang 3.4 obviously will not ship with OpenMP, but maybe >> later versions. > > Active development happens in Intel's tree, and is slowly being merged upstream. Eventually, Clang will have full OpenMP 4 support, but Intel's tree will have it first and there is likely to be a lag before it makes it into mainline clang. > > As such, it would make sense to have a port as a stop-gap until it is ready. > Ah, ok, that makes sense. Thanks for explanation. BTW very amusing *and* very informative bsdtalk/vBSDCon2013 talk a while ago, thanks for that! :) Cheers MichaelReceived on Wed Jan 29 2014 - 14:57:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:46 UTC