* Steve Kargl (sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu) wrote: > > > > - bad enough by itself, it affects libstdc++ from ports' gcc in such a > > > > way that it disables C++11 math completely (along with a lot more > > > > other more widely used math functions) > > > > > > > > > > > > - we may probably implement these by calling less-precise > > > > erf erfc lgamma tgamma as we do with other functions as we alredy > > > > do with some others > > > > > > This, unfortuantely, has already been done, although it may only > > > be available in FreeBSD-current. See src/lib/msun/src/imprecise.c. > > > > I know, it's available on 10.0 as well. However that's not the case for > > 9.x, for which it's impossible to build c++11 math using software (even > > if it doesn't use unimplemented functions), neither with system gcc > > nor with gcc from ports. > > > > It's not impossible. Add whatever C++-fu you need > that is equivalent to > > #include <math.h> > #ifndef fool > #define fool(x) foo((double)(x)) > #endif The point was that one should not be required to do something like this to build std::hypot - using software on FreeBSD. --- +#define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1 +#include <math.h> +long double erfl(long double x) { return erf(x); } +long double erfcl(long double x) { return erfc(x); } +long double lgammal(long double x) { return lgamma(x); } +long double tgammal(long double x) { return tgamma(x); } + #include <cmath> int main() { std::hypot(3.0, 4.0); } --- -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3_at_amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3_at_jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ruReceived on Wed Jan 29 2014 - 21:23:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:46 UTC