Re: Status of llvm/clang 3.4?

From: Dimitry Andric <dim_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 19:59:40 +0100
On 04 Mar 2014, at 19:04, Ed Maste <emaste_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 4 March 2014 12:22, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:17:18PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>> What is the current status of clang, regarding known bugs, on FreeBSD-current?
>>> 
>>> There were reports of www/firefox failing to build because of bug in llvm.
>> 
>> Still broken of i386.  Given the google results for "llvm ud2"
>> it is likely that clang will never be fixed.
> 
> Except in this case it's just a plain old Clang bug, not a general
> undefined behaviour issue.  The Clang PR is here:
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19007
> 
> Dimitry has a patch to work around the issue in FreeBSD PR 187103:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187103

Indeed, for now you can just drop the two attached patches in
/usr/ports/www/firefox/files, and it should then work after rebuilding.
(Thanks to Michael Butler for the second patch. :)

-Dimitry



Received on Tue Mar 04 2014 - 17:59:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC