On 4 Mar, Ed Maste wrote: > On 4 March 2014 12:22, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:17:18PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> > What is the current status of clang, regarding known bugs, on FreeBSD-current? >> > >> > There were reports of www/firefox failing to build because of bug in llvm. >> >> Still broken of i386. Given the google results for "llvm ud2" >> it is likely that clang will never be fixed. > > Except in this case it's just a plain old Clang bug, not a general > undefined behaviour issue. The Clang PR is here: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19007 > > Dimitry has a patch to work around the issue in FreeBSD PR 187103: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187103 In addtion to this firefox (and libxul - same fix applies) problem, I also ran into problems with: multimedia/libxine PR 187017 already fixed multimedia/gstreamer-ffmpeg PR 187018 already fixed math/atlas PR 186997 i386 only / patch in PR math/fftw* PR 186998 i386 only / patch in PR These are not clang bugs, but differences from gcc. Also, not a clang bug, but caused by the lack of gcc in base: graphics/jogl PR 187186 patch in PR I also ran into a problem bulding math/py-numeric for i386 on a machine with an Athlon 64 CPU, which causes -march=athlon64 to be set. In this case clang aborts. I filed this bug bug report upstream: <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19029>. I ran into a few more broken ports, but the problems are not clang related.Received on Tue Mar 04 2014 - 18:22:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:47 UTC