On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mark Saad <nonesuch_at_longcount.org> wrote: > > > > On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Peter Pentchev <roam_at_ringlet.net> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote: > >>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo_at_iet.unipi.it> wrote: > >>> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate > >>> for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to > >>> suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the projects > >>> suggested there are not important, just belong somewhere else > >>> e.g. gsoc. > >> > > I have a few ideas for younger and or less experienced google code in > people > > 1. Analyze the CD/USB install process . > Does the actual process match the guide and or general docs . > > 2. Analyze / comment on the automated install process "jumpstart ". Does > the guide and general docs match the actual process . > > 3. Test the virtual machine images as vagrant box images , and create > vagrant box images from the official vm images . > > 4. Create a script for the installer "bsd install" to use glabel to label > gparts slices as /dev/label/$NAME > > 5. Test the ami images , again can the docs be improved are they accurate . > > The > > Now let me preface the docs tasks , by no means am I saying that the docs > team has made lots of mistakes and their work needs to be rechecked . The > tasks are small enough that most high school aged people could grasp the > issue, with out any prior experience in BSD world . Rechecking the docs is > always a good idea . > > They should allow the code in members to make some good contributions ; > and maybe even some good improvements . > > >> I refrained from voicing my opinion while the call for help was going > >> on, but I completely agree that the target age of this Google initiative > >> is inadequate to FreeBSD. The target population is 13 years to 17 years > >> old and I cannot even imagine a 13 year old knowing what FreeBSD is. > > > > ...and yet there was pat_at_ becoming a ports committer at the age of 16 > > and chris_at_ becoming a docs committer at the age of 14 :) I think hmp_at_, > > alepulver_at_, issyl0_at_ and jmallett_at_ were pretty young when they joined, > > too. > > > > Just an observation, I know that one or two isolated cases do not prove > > a point :) > > > > G'luck, > > Peter > > > > -- > > Peter Pentchev roam_at_ringlet.net roam_at_FreeBSD.org p.penchev_at_storpool.com > > PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc > > Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 > > Mark saad | mark.saad_at_longcount.org > One important program class for the less experienced people ( as users and programmers ) would be the following : (1) For the command line operating system programs , mostly it is necessary to give parameters on command line . For example : $ ifconfig displays the NIC information . To apply some operations , it is necessary to give parameters : $ ifconfig -... ... .... ... ... To give these parameters even by using man pages are very difficult even for the experienced users . Task : By using for selected OS programs , write a routine to the following : When a user enters only program name , display a form to get parameters for execution ( this requires some changes to programs doing operations just by giving its name by specifying a parameter for such cases ) in such a way that get parameters in an order by supplying form parts with respect to previously given parameter values , i.e. , do not present all of the items , let the user some values , and smash the user that such parameters are given incorrectly . Manual pages may be used , but sometimes it is necessary to read the source code of the program to isolate error cases and dependencies . (2) Some programs may use many parameters and every time giving them as command line parameters or by filling forms may not be a very convenient way . By using Expat libraries ( or any other suitable library ) , write a routine for a selected command line program to enter parameters from an XML file with the following structure : $ program_name _at_XML_parameters file_name Such a result may be obtained by using scripts for executing the programs with specific parameters , but using the above structure may be more convenient usage and they may be used in testing also more easily because some files may be output of other programs . (3) Many OS programs are given their outputs in an arbitrary text form . For automated tests , or input to other programs , these outputs are very difficult to use . For selected OS programs , give all of the output in XML ( or any other selected structured form ) .which they can be processed by using Expat library . To process these outputs , also write a routine by using Expat library to load it into a tree . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol SanliturkReceived on Fri Nov 14 2014 - 11:06:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC