On 9/14/14, 3:22 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Alfred Perlstein <bright_at_mu.org > <mailto:bright_at_mu.org>> wrote: > > > On 9/13/14, 11:39 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > Should really be a standalone package. > > > It's not exactly the same, but the lang/python2 port for example is a > meta-port which creates > symlinks such as /usr/local/bin/python2 -> python2.7. > > So the precedent of having a metaport which creates symlinks is there. > What folks have been complaining about in this thread is having symlinks > in the "base system directories" such as /bin. Why do you care what people are complaining about? Just make the port. :) > > My personal feeling is that we should look at this on a case-by-case > basis and allow these types > of ports, such as for /bin/bash but I'm sure others will disagree. We already allow such ports, for example a bunch of kmods install into /boot/kernel or /boot/modules. There are always exceptions to rules and for good reasons! find . -name pkg-plist | xargs grep -A 3 '^_at_cwd /$' > -- > CraigReceived on Sun Sep 14 2014 - 20:32:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:52 UTC