Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:54:31 -0700 Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn_at_freebsd.org> schrieb: > > On 09/16/14 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Am Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:09:01 -0700 > > Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn_at_freebsd.org> schrieb: > > > >> On 09/15/14 22:51, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>> Am Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:39:26 -0700 > >>> Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn_at_freebsd.org> schrieb: > >>> > >>>> On 09/15/14 17:36, Allan Jude wrote: > >>>>> On 2014-09-15 20:05, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>>>>> Installing FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20140903-r270990 on a Laptop works for UEFI > >>>>>> fine. After I updated the sources to r271649, recompiled world and kernel (as > >>>>>> well as installed), now I get stuck with the screen message: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> FreeBSD EFI boot block > >>>>>> Loader path: /boot/loader.efi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> and nothing happens. After a couple of minutes, the system reboots. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What happened and how can this problem be solved? > >>>>>> > >>>>> You might need to update the boot1.efi file on the UEFI partition (small > >>>>> FAT partition on the disk) > >>>>> > >>>>> I am not sure how 'in sync' boot1.efi (on the fat partiton) and > >>>>> loader.efi have to be. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/UEFI > >>>>> > >>>> boot1.efi is designed never to need updating. (It also hasn't changed > >>>> since April) > >>>> -Nathan > >>> But it has changed bytesize when I recompiled world with recent sources compared to > >>> the boot.efi size from the USB image I installed from (revision see above). > >> Probably compiler updates or something? I really wouldn't worry about it > >> too much. I'd worry more about loader, since we know boot1 could use the > >> console but loader doesn't show up. > >> > >>> How to update bootcode on UEFI layout? I created a GPT partition with type efi (1 > >>> GB) as well as a 512KB partition typed freebsd-boot. > >> How did you set it up in the first place? If you have a FreeBSD-only > >> system partition (like the installer sets up), you just dd > >> /boot/boot1.efifat to the EFI partition. Otherwise, it's FAT and you > >> copy /boot/boot1.efi to somewhere your boot manager can find it. > >> > >>> I'm new to EFI and the way the notebook now behaves is really strange. While the USB > >>> drive image used to boot with new console enabled, it now boots again with the old > >>> console and 800x640 resolution. This might indicate some minor but very effective > >>> mistake I made. > >>> > >> The EFI boot block finds the first UFS partition -- on any disk -- and > >> tries to boot from it. If you have multiple FreeBSD disks connected, > >> that will very likely result in madness. > >> -Nathan > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > After I managed to install the OS and updated to the most recent world, it took two > > days to have all the installations prepared. Now I'm about the configure X11 and run > > into another very annoying situation. > > > > The Laptop is a Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E540 equipted with the following CPU/iGPU and > > dedicated GPU: > > > > CPU Intel i5-4200M (Haswell) at 2.5 GHz with iGPU Intel HD Graphics 4600 > > > > GPU: nVidia GT 740M mobile GPU. > > > > EFI Version 2.31 > > EFI Firmware: Lenovo (rev. 05648) > > > > In the Firmware/EFI/BIOS the primary GPU is selected to be the nVidia GT 740M. Boot is > > EFI only, no CSM support. With CSM support enabled a VGA screen with 640x400 pixel > > shows up. Non UEFI options doesn't boot this system at all! > > > > Any attempt to bring up the nVidia GPU (starting X for testing) ends up in a blank > > screen, stuck mousepointer, no keyboard. I even can not switch to another console! > > When X server started the first time on tty9, I can switch to another console. But the > > moment I switch back to ttyv9 everything is frozen and as described above. > > Try xf86-video-scfb instead? > > > When the system boots, I do not see a loader! Where is the loader I'm used to see > > when I have the chance to switch to single user mode, console or switch off ACPI? > > There is no beastie menu for UEFI, and will not be, since it UEFI's > terminal emulation does not provide the required features. You can boot > single user from the loader command line, however, with boot -s, for > example. The interface is identical to what you get if you choose > "Loader prompt" in the usual menu. Good to know. > > > Because I need X11 up (and it should be running on the nVidia GPU for performance > > reasons), I tried to get back to the legacy "sc" console in textmode since I read > > about several issues and immature vt() system, so I put those lines in > > the /boot/loader.conf: > > > > hw.vga.textmode=1 > > hw.vty=sc > > > > (tried also hw.vty=vt). > > > > But with either of those lines in the loader thing get more annoying and nasty: The > > system doesn't show even a console, it is stuck with this sparse EFI boot message, > > last lines are > > > > dimensions xxxx x yyyy > > stride xxxx > > masks 0xfffffff [...] > > > > and the rest of the screen is blank. System remains unusable, the HDD is working and > > obviously booting the system but incapable of presenting a screen. When booting the > > USB drive image, this initial EFI message gets overwritten (no screen blanking, the > > kernel messages starts writing over this message like in the first days of > > computers ...). In the case described above that doesn't happen at all. > > syscons does not support UEFI systems at all. Since it can't initialize > the VGA hardware, you get a blank screen. hw.vga.textmode also won't > have any effect since EFI systems don't use the vga driver for console, > instead using an EFI-provided framebuffer structure through the vt_efifb > driver. Oh, I lack in informations of how this new system is working. So vga is obsolete then and should be this efifb then. > > > After I deleted.commented out the lines > > > > hw.vga.textmode=1 > > hw.vty=sc > > > > in loader.conf the system is booting again - and clears the initial EFI messages > > before dumping the screen with kernel messages, as expected. > > > > Well, at the end, it seems I sit in front of two days useless labor, new hardware, > > UEFI and no X11. > > One thing you might want to try that got my Haswell laptop up is to use > the x11-drivers/xf86-video-scfb driver. This uses the vt framebuffer > directly. It's more or less the equivalent of the VESA driver since it > is unaccelerated, but it will work. We really need actual Haswell > graphics drivers (I suspect they are required to get the multiple GPU > handoff to work as well). > -Nathan This laptop has, as mentioned, also a dedicated GPU, nVidia GT 740M which is supposed to work with a new driver BLOB 343.13 (driver: nvidia). I do not want to use the iGPU HD4600, also it could save energy/battery lifetime, but there is no method to switch between both. I'd like to use this GPU, not the slower HD4600 Haswell iGPU. As far as I know from other notebooks I ran with FreeBSD, this x11-drivers/xf86-video-scfb as well as its VESA counterpart is insanely slow and not very usefull for high resolution displays. It might be useful having a display anyway. But, anyway thanks for your assistance, very appreciated. Regards, Oliver
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:52 UTC