Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

From: Jos Backus <jos_at_catnook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:43:06 -0700
On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" <lars.engels_at_0x20.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote:
> > Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to
> > import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better
> > tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn
> > something new, which I know can be a challenge.
>
> I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it would soon
> be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages.

It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better installed from
ports/packages, too.

It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS.

Jos
Received on Mon May 11 2015 - 13:49:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:57 UTC