On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:43:06AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > On May 11, 2015 2:31 AM, "Lars Engels" <lars.engels_at_0x20.net> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: > > > Maybe off-topic, but functionality-wise it might make much more sense to > > > import Fossil. RCS has too many limitations this day and age when better > > > tools are available. Of course, this would require people to learn > > > something new, which I know can be a challenge. > > > > I really like fossil. But it's still under development, so it would soon > > be outdated. It's better installed from ports/packages. > > It seems OpenRCS is still under development ;-p It's better installed from > ports/packages, too. > > It would give Fossil a recognition boost as a BSD-licensed DVCS. > Please, just stop. Thanks. -- SteveReceived on Mon May 11 2015 - 14:11:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:57 UTC