> On Nov 8, 2015, at 17:04, Garance A Drosehn <drosih_at_rpi.edu> wrote: > > On 7 Nov 2015, at 6:08, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: >> >> as you're still maintaining lpr, I'm passing this through you. >> >> If one build his server WITHOUT_LPR, there are constantly few directories that >> are created by make hierarchy and then reported my make check-old. >> >> Attached is a small patch against -current that should eliminate it (inspired >> by BSD.groff.mtree). >> >> Your thoughts? > > Thanks for checking with me. > > While I've done a lot with 'lpr', I have not done much of anything with > mtree files. > > After having read through the rest of this thread, I have the impression > that we're no longer interested in a separate mtree subfile for 'lpr'. > Instead we'll go with Brian's observation that: "if a directory is in the > dist mtrees, it should not be listed as an OLD_DIRS." > > Am I correct in thinking that? With OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc, yes. With ObsoleteFiles.inc, the directories should still be removed. Thanks! -NGieReceived on Mon Nov 09 2015 - 00:10:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC