On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Bryan Drewery <bdrewery_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper >> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth >> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port. > > I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still > haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far > less intrusive than HPN. > Yes, it's very small. /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC