> On 11 Nov 2015, at 16:53 , Bryan Drewery <bdrewery_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Bryan Drewery <bdrewery_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper >>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth >>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port. >> >> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still >> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far >> less intrusive than HPN. >> > > Yes, it's very small. > /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers And thanks to both of you for keeping it. It’s often the best you can get if you have machines which run w/o firewalls. Just wanted to say “thanks”! /bzReceived on Wed Nov 11 2015 - 16:00:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC