On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> writes: > > Can you explain what is problem? > > Radical suggestion: read the first email in the thread. I am read and don't understund (you talk about trouble of maintaining the HPN patches). I see patched version in ports. This version maintaining. What is problem? Differnt openssh? Quality of patches? Different branches? ports branch is worse (by some reaason) base branch? > > PS: As I today know, kerberos heimdal is practicaly dead as opensource > > project. Have FreeBSD planed switch to MIT Kerberos? I am know about > > security/krb5. > > We switched from MIT to Heimdal at some point in the past for some > reason I don't remember. MIT and Heimdal are *not* interchangeable at I think because MIT stop development in the past. > the source or binary level, so switching back is not trivial. I am know about this.Received on Wed Nov 11 2015 - 17:44:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC