Ben Woods wrote this message on Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 16:27 +0800: > On Wednesday, 11 November 2015, John-Mark Gurney <jmg_at_funkthat.com> wrote: > > > Ben Woods wrote this message on Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 15:40 +0800: > > > I have to agree that there are cases when the NONE cipher makes sense, > > and > > > it is up to the end user to make sure they know what they are doing. > > > > > > Personally I have used it at home to backup my old FreeBSD server (which > > > does not have AESNI) over a dedicated network connection to a backup > > server > > > using rsync/ssh. Since it was not possible for anyone else to be on that > > > local network, and the server was so old it didn't have AESNI and would > > > soon be retired, using the NONE cipher sped up the transfer > > significantly. > > > > If you have a trusted network, why not just use nc? > > Honest answer: ignorance of how I can use netcat together with rsync. A quick google of rsync nc, turned up method 2 & 4 from: https://rsync.samba.org/firewall.html -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."Received on Wed Nov 11 2015 - 18:25:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC