Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues?

From: Dan Partelly <dan_partelly_at_rdsor.ro>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:10:34 +0200
Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does the work, even with with no proper review of the problem at hand , and the proposed solutions ? 


> On 15 Nov 2015, at 19:05, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The reason is simple - someone offered to do the work and push it through.
> 
> This isn't a commercial thing where we get to make project decisions
> and allocate resources - the juniper folk came up with a solution that
> they're using and willing to push forward in freebsd. It's been an
> interesting experiment and maybe it shouldn't have been done in -HEAD,
> but it isn't all that pervasive and we've gotten good feedback from it
> all.
> 
> 
> -adrian
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Sun Nov 15 2015 - 16:10:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC