On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:25:54PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Channeling my inner bde (maybe?), the typedef is probably helpful, but > uintmax_t seems less so. uintmax_t has no guaranteed ABI, so a > fixed-width type like uint64_t seems beter, assuming that uintmax_t is > currently uint64_t everywhere (which I think is the case but did not > verify). The statement about {u}intmax_t not having a guaranteed ABI is wrong, I believe. You cannot change the type after it is exposed. I am sure that ANSI C or POSIX would introduce intthistimerealmax_t after long long long type is added (only half-joking).Received on Tue Nov 17 2015 - 07:09:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC