Oliver, did you try Sean's suggestion? - Eric On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:10 PM Sean Bruno <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 09/21/15 23:23, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:13:18 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10_at_gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> If you do a diff between r288057 and r287761, there are no > >> differences between the sys/dev/e1000, sys/modules/em, and > >> sys/modules/igb directories. Are you sure r287761 actually > >> works? > > > > I'm quite sure r287761 works (and r287762 doesn't), double checked > > this this morning again. I also checked r288093 and it is still not > > working. > > > > The ensure that I'm not the culprit and stupid here: > > > > I use a NanoBSD environment and the only thing that gets exchanged, > > is the underlying OS/OS revision. The configuration always stays > > the same. The base system for all of my tests is built from a clean > > source - (deleted obj/ dir, clean, fresh build into obj/ for every > > test I ran). > > > > I realised a funny thing. Playing around with enabling/disabling > > TSO (I have been told that could be the culprit in an earlier Email > > from this list) with the commend sequence: > > > > ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 -tso ifconfig igb1 up ifconfig > > igb1 down ifconfig igb1 tso ifconfig igb1 up . . . > > > > while a ping is pinging in the background a remote host connected > > to that specific interface, the ping does work for a while and dies > > then after a round trip of roughly 10 - 20. I can reproduce this. > > > > is that observation of any help? > > > > Regards, > > > > oh > > > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:58 AM O. Hartmann > >> <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:23:44 -0700 Sean Bruno > >>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> > > > > > > On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote: > >>>>>> He has an i210 -- he would want to revert > >>>>>> e1000_i210.[ch], too. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a > >>>>>> good idea for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and > >>>>>> I can go look at trying these shared code updates and igb > >>>>>> changes internally again. We at Intel really could've > >>>>>> done a better job of making sure these changes worked > >>>>>> across a wider variety of devices. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Eric > > > > I've reverted the changes to head. I'll reopen the reviews and we > > can proceed from there. > > > > sean > > > > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno > >>>>>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org <mailto:sbruno_at_freebsd.org>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> r287762 broke the system > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test > >>>>>> revert r287762 from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and > >>>>>> e1000_82575.h *only* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That narrows down the change quite a bit. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> sean _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org > >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> mailing list > >>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org > >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org>" > >>>>>> > >>> > >>> I'm now on r288057 on that specific machine, supposedly > >>> reverted changes that seemingly has been identified as the > >>> culprit. Still NO change in behaviour! > >>> > >>> r287761 works with the same configuration on igb (i210), any > >>> further does not. Not ping/connect from the outside, no > >>> ping/connect from the inside. Tried different protocols (SAMBA, > >>> ssh, LDAP, DNS). Affected is/are only boxes with the igb driver > >>> and i210 chipset (we do not have other chips covered by igb). > >>> > >>> Regards, Oliver > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To > >> unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > > > > > > For my entertainment (and HPS's), can you run HEAD and revert r287775? > > sean > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWAbWOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx > MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kPTAH/jmm1tudLRYVtC+xb9NXHQgr > dl8/fZC8/xL3m0EVM8pWdKlRbF1tHUDSB/2ftYUBEe6SIkab2IZx2Z/0VgdflrbB > 05HQUuq1yM3dYBiEAjyM0oK6lfeWu2Jg8nOaA5YWi1GO2OfkuDfXRUkK3sm7xa0C > PE+ZMlfofQCV0RyDu2ew17yZKYRbCXdc+GYg6CGNRRVJHeITZPyAAh8X1d7pC8G3 > 8vJLKC8JOmg0i5yToYSkKvXdrReHUpzF+hZKgxsl5Lb4BhcHEukkSWQVsJ9IuVGU > 615sN6eVub2+OBbxJyV+CcjUVwdLJba/YBUXhWdKslDrN2z9l/sAFHCxDJlmAvc= > =zdDL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Thu Oct 01 2015 - 13:39:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC