Am Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:39:11 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10_at_gmail.com> schrieb: > Oliver, > > did you try Sean's suggestion? > > - Eric Hello Eric, no, sorry, not yet. Today was the first day with the igb-equipted servers and tomorrow (Friday) I will start to check whether Sean's suggestion helps or not. In the short time I fiddled arounf with the server, I brought up and down in a series the igb0|1 interfaces and pinged the system (with most recent CURRENT as of ~ 15:00 CEST (UTC +2). And while doing that, this flapping the UP and DOWN state made the interfaces work for a couple of seconds - but it was hardly to reproduce with a defined set of UP and DOWNs. I will report. Oliver > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:10 PM Sean Bruno <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > > > On 09/21/15 23:23, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:13:18 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10_at_gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> If you do a diff between r288057 and r287761, there are no > > >> differences between the sys/dev/e1000, sys/modules/em, and > > >> sys/modules/igb directories. Are you sure r287761 actually > > >> works? > > > > > > I'm quite sure r287761 works (and r287762 doesn't), double checked > > > this this morning again. I also checked r288093 and it is still not > > > working. > > > > > > The ensure that I'm not the culprit and stupid here: > > > > > > I use a NanoBSD environment and the only thing that gets exchanged, > > > is the underlying OS/OS revision. The configuration always stays > > > the same. The base system for all of my tests is built from a clean > > > source - (deleted obj/ dir, clean, fresh build into obj/ for every > > > test I ran). > > > > > > I realised a funny thing. Playing around with enabling/disabling > > > TSO (I have been told that could be the culprit in an earlier Email > > > from this list) with the commend sequence: > > > > > > ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 -tso ifconfig igb1 up ifconfig > > > igb1 down ifconfig igb1 tso ifconfig igb1 up . . . > > > > > > while a ping is pinging in the background a remote host connected > > > to that specific interface, the ping does work for a while and dies > > > then after a round trip of roughly 10 - 20. I can reproduce this. > > > > > > is that observation of any help? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > oh > > > > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:58 AM O. Hartmann > > >> <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:23:44 -0700 Sean Bruno > > >>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > >>> > > > > > > > > > On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote: > > >>>>>> He has an i210 -- he would want to revert > > >>>>>> e1000_i210.[ch], too. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a > > >>>>>> good idea for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and > > >>>>>> I can go look at trying these shared code updates and igb > > >>>>>> changes internally again. We at Intel really could've > > >>>>>> done a better job of making sure these changes worked > > >>>>>> across a wider variety of devices. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Eric > > > > > > I've reverted the changes to head. I'll reopen the reviews and we > > > can proceed from there. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno > > >>>>>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org <mailto:sbruno_at_freebsd.org>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> r287762 broke the system > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test > > >>>>>> revert r287762 from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and > > >>>>>> e1000_82575.h *only* > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> That narrows down the change quite a bit. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> sean _______________________________________________ > > >>>>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org > > >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> mailing list > > >>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >>>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org > > >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org>" > > >>>>>> > > >>> > > >>> I'm now on r288057 on that specific machine, supposedly > > >>> reverted changes that seemingly has been identified as the > > >>> culprit. Still NO change in behaviour! > > >>> > > >>> r287761 works with the same configuration on igb (i210), any > > >>> further does not. Not ping/connect from the outside, no > > >>> ping/connect from the inside. Tried different protocols (SAMBA, > > >>> ssh, LDAP, DNS). Affected is/are only boxes with the igb driver > > >>> and i210 chipset (we do not have other chips covered by igb). > > >>> > > >>> Regards, Oliver > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To > > >> unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > For my entertainment (and HPS's), can you run HEAD and revert r287775? > > > > sean > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2 > > > > iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWAbWOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx > > MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kPTAH/jmm1tudLRYVtC+xb9NXHQgr > > dl8/fZC8/xL3m0EVM8pWdKlRbF1tHUDSB/2ftYUBEe6SIkab2IZx2Z/0VgdflrbB > > 05HQUuq1yM3dYBiEAjyM0oK6lfeWu2Jg8nOaA5YWi1GO2OfkuDfXRUkK3sm7xa0C > > PE+ZMlfofQCV0RyDu2ew17yZKYRbCXdc+GYg6CGNRRVJHeITZPyAAh8X1d7pC8G3 > > 8vJLKC8JOmg0i5yToYSkKvXdrReHUpzF+hZKgxsl5Lb4BhcHEukkSWQVsJ9IuVGU > > 615sN6eVub2+OBbxJyV+CcjUVwdLJba/YBUXhWdKslDrN2z9l/sAFHCxDJlmAvc= > > =zdDL > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC