Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:32:58 +0300
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:27:52AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> Again, the point is that those objecting should put aside the time to 
> implement what you (and I) are suggesting:
> 
> > I could live with:
> >
> > base-utils    11.1
> >  - ktrace  uninstalled
> >  - tcpdump uninstalled
> >  + dd          11.1.1   (CVE-123412 fix)
> >
> >
> >
> > but not
> > {700 packages )
> > dd  11.1.1 dd with CVE fix
> > {29 more packages}
> > [tcpdump line is not present but you don't notice that]
> > {10 more packages}
> > [ktrace line would be here but you don't notice that either]
> > {15 more packages}
> 
> What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked 
> by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.

Teoretical.
In practical this is happen with me.
Received on Tue Apr 19 2016 - 12:33:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC