Re: ZFSROOT UEFI boot

From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:43:56 +0900
I found Diff6 you uploaded to PHABRICATOR. So my report below is based
on it.

The patched boot1.efi runs as expected (== as you wrote) for me.
  *boot1.efi without -DEFI_DEBUG isn't tested. Needed?

As I mentioned in my previous post, I have no serial console
environment. So I took movie of limited tests and typed it.

Which of the tests are typed:

  1) Boot from ada0 removing ada1, no USB memstick attached, ZFS in
     ada0 has loader.efi. (Single drive config.)

  2) Boot from ada0, no USB memstick attached, ZFS in ada0 has
     loader.efi.

  3) Boot from ada1, no USB memstick attached, ZFS in ada1 has
     loader.efi.

  4) Boot from ada1, no USB memstick attached, only UFS in ada0 has
     loader.efi.

  5) Boot from da0 (USB memstick with memstick.img of head).
     UFS in da0 has loader.efi and ZFS isn't present in da0.
     (3 drives [2 drives + USB memstick] config.)

Please see attached text for detail. Are more outputs needed?

Thanks in advance! I'm looking forward to see this MFC'ed before
releng/10.3 is branched. (Relies on imp_at_'s test?)

 *Will need to be in conjunction with changes after r294265 in head, as
  currently Diff6 doesn't apply to stable/10.

Regards.


On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 19:12:34 +0000
Steven Hartland <killing_at_multiplay.co.uk> wrote:

> I believe, based on testing, that the from Diff 5 onwards of 
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5108 this should work as you expect it i.e.
> 
> If boot1 is loaded from a device which has either a UFS or ZFS bootable 
> install then this is the device that will be used to boot.
> 
> If said device has both then the ZFS setup will still be tried first.
> 
> If you can test in your setup and confirm either way that would be most 
> appreciated.
> 
>      Regards
>      Steve
> 
> On 30/01/2016 06:57, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> > Thanks for your quick support!
> > I tried your patch [Diff1] (built with head r295032 world/kernel) and
> > now have good and bad news.
> >
> > Good news is that without USB memstick boot1.efi runs as expected.
> > Great!
> >
> > Bad news is that when booting from USB memstick (the one I used my
> > previous test, boot1.efi [bootx64.efi] and loader.efi is replaced) and
> > whichever of internal disk (ada[01]) have loader.efi in its ZFS pool,
> > ada[01] is booted instead of da0 (USB memstick).
> >
> >    *If ada0 has loader.efi, always booted from ada0 (stable/10).
> >    *If ada0 doesn't have loader.efi and ada1 has, booted from ada1
> >     (head).
> >    *If both ada0 and ada1 don't have loader.efi, da0 (USB memstick) is
> >     booted (head, installer is invoked).
> >
> >   *Whichever ada[01] has loader.efi in their UFS or not didn't matter.
> >
> > These behaviour would be because ZFS thoughout all disks is tried
> > before trying UFS throughout all disks, if I understood correctly.
> >
> > Changing boot order (ZFS to UFS per each disk, instead of each
> > ZFS to each UFS) would help.
> > But providing ZFS-disabled boot1.efi (boot1ufs.efi?) for installation
> > media (memstick, dvd, ...) helps, too. I built ZFS-disabled boot1.efi
> > and it worked fine for USB memstick for me.
> >
> >   *`make clean && make -DMK_ZFS=no` in sys/boot/efi/boot1 didn't disabled
> >     ZFS module, so I must edit the definition of *boot_modules[] in
> >     boot1.c. I'd have been missing something.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 02:58:26 +0000
> > Steven Hartland <killing_at_multiplay.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On 28/01/2016 16:22, Doug Rabson wrote:
> >>> On 28 January 2016 at 15:03, Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It's exactly the NO GOOD point. The disk where boot1 is read from
> >>>> should be where loader.efi and loader.conf are first read.
> >>>>
> >>> I just wanted to note that gptzfsboot and zfsboot behaves this way. Boot1
> >>> looks for loader in the pool which contains the disk that the BIOS booted.
> >>> It passes through the ID of that pool to loader which uses that pool as the
> >>> default for loading kernel and modules. I believe this is the correct
> >>> behaviour. For gptzfsboot and zfsboot, it is possible to override by
> >>> pressing space at the point where it is about to load loader.
> >> I believe I understand at least some of your issue now, could you please
> >> test the code on the following review to see if it fixes your issue please:
> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5108
> >>
> >>       Regards
> >>       Steve
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> >>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 


-- 
Tomoaki AOKI    junchoon_at_dec.sakura.ne.jp

Received on Sun Jan 31 2016 - 10:44:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:02 UTC