On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:18:06PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:02:38 +0300 > Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> schrieb: > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:50:34PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > pipe(2) had an unnecessarily odd calling convention (ignoring the > > > argument the user thought they were passing and returning the two file > > > descriptors via the two return registers). This required machine > > > dependent assembly for every target and special handling in tracing > > > tools (ktrace, dtrace, etc). On 64-bit platforms, pipe(2)'s > > > implementation is the only reason the two-register return model needs to > > > exist at all (on 32-bit platforms it allows off_t to be returned from > > > lseek). > > getpid() is another instance. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > That all is a nice explanation, but how to recover from a broken system, on which the > order of installation wasn't performed the right way? Copy the libc.so.7 binary from the build area to /lib manually, e.g. using rescue shell.Received on Sat Jun 25 2016 - 09:35:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:06 UTC