On 11/03/2016 01:42, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 3/11/2016 10:45 AM, Pete Wright wrote: >> >> >> On 11/02/2016 19:17, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> On 26/10/2016 2:27 AM, Eivind Nicolay Evensen wrote: >>>> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:38:04PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> >>>>> For long we are planning to remove GNU rcs from base, after a >>>>> failed attempt >>>>> before FreeBSD 10.0. Let see where we are to be able to remove it >>>>> from FreeBSD >>>>> 12. >>> >>> why should we remove it? >>> What will replace it? it's an integral part of many people's systems. >>> >>> Is there a non gnu RCS with the same features? >>> >> >> surprised to hear so many people are dependent upon having rcs in >> their base system. there are options though - for example OpenBSD >> uses OpenRCS in their base: > I don't see what is surprising about it. > It's been common "best practice" for decades to keep all your files in > /etc under source control. RCS fits he bill well and many people have > it in their muscle memory. heh - not trying to start a bike shed, and I certainly have used RCS in that manner in the past, although I supplanted it for a configuration management engine quite a while ago as the industry moved towards more distributed environments where systems automation became more practical. regardless - sounds like people still using rcs should be able to kick the tires on OpenRCS and see if it fits their needs. -peteReceived on Thu Nov 03 2016 - 14:05:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:08 UTC