On 15 December 2017 at 13:02, David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Wolfram Schneider wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I upgraded a machine from 11-stable to 12-current. The /usr/obj tree >> is now 11GB huge: >> >> FreeBSD 12-current >> $ du -hs /usr/obj >> 11G /usr/obj >> >> on FreeBSD 11-stable it was less the size: >> $ du -hs /usr/obj >> 5.6G /usr/obj >> >> this is a problem when you have a small VM with 20GB disk space or less. >> >> Is there a way to use less /usr/obj disk space during build? I know >> that we have to do some bootstrapping for newer compiler tools, but >> does we need to keep all temp files during the build? > > There was a change near the beginning of November; please see UPDATING > entry 20171101 -- you probably have several no-longer-used > subdirectories under /usr/obj/usr/src/. > > Once those are cleared out, my experience (tracking stable/11 & head in > different slices on the same machines) is that stbale/11 is using about > 5.0G, while head uses about 6.1G. I think the suspect directories are "tmp" and "obj-lib32", together they are 4.1GB huge. I will run a build of current again with a clean obj tree (-current on a recent -current). Let's see. Can we agree that the obj tree should not grow from 5GB to 10GB for the next release? -Wolfram -- Wolfram Schneider <wosch_at_FreeBSD.org> https://wolfram.schneider.orgReceived on Fri Dec 15 2017 - 15:51:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:14 UTC